The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
The Kelly Law Firm Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2016 top 100 lawyer ASLA
10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys

Disclosure of Confidential Informants under Pennsylvania Law

The issue of whether the Commonwealth must disclose the identity of a confidential informant generally arises in two cases: where an informant provides probable cause for the issuance of a warrant; and non-warrant cases, where the informant is an eyewitness to the crime charged and the defense raises misidentification as its defense. 

The Commonwealth enjoys a qualified privilege that allows it to withhold the identity of a confidential informant.  In order to overcome this privilege, the defense must first establish the informant's identity is material to the preparation of its defense.   Additionally, the defense must show the request is reasonable.

Once the defense satisfies its initial burden, the trial court is required to exercise its discretion and weigh relevant factors to determine if the Commonwealth should reveal the informant's identity.  There is no single, determinative factor in deciding whether disclosure of the informant's identity is required.  Instead, the court must focus on the particular circumstances of each case and take into account the crime charged, possible defenses, significance of the informant's testimony, and any other relevant factors.  Although the balancing test is weighted in the Commonwealth's favor, the privilege must give way if disclosure of the informant's identity "is relevant and helpful to the defense or is essential to a fair determination of the case."

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Why We Succeed

Preparation.

We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...

Experience.

For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...

Commitment.

We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule a Case Evaluation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
West Chester Law Office Map

Review Us
Back to Top