The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
The Kelly Law Firm Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2016 top 100 lawyer ASLA
10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys

Class action calls Pennsylvania civil forfeiture laws unlawful

In Pennsylvania, as well as a number of other states, there is a little-known legal device called civil forfeiture that allows police and law enforcement agencies to seize both real and personal property from an individual without ever needing to charge the individual with a crime. That's because, according to the law, it's not the person who is guilty of the crime but rather the property itself. This has given rise to unusual civil actions that puts the burden of proof on a person to prove their innocence in order to retrieve their items.

Even though this practice is perfectly legal here in our state, some residents believe that civil forfeiture laws violate a citizen's Fourth Amendment right to due process. These residents felt so strongly about this belief that they filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court in August. They claim that the district attorney's office and the Philadelphia police are abusing civil forfeiture to pad police budgets and justifying this abuse by claiming that it is aiding in the war on drugs.

Some here in West Chester may have heard about the case Sourovelis v. the City of Philadelphia, which the court still has yet to make a decision on. The case is significant because it raises an important question for the courts to answer: is civil forfeiture really helping police mitigate drug crimes in the state or are police overstretching the law and actually violating people's civil rights?

This isn't the first time this question has been raised. In fact, in the 1996 case of Bennis v. Michigan, the U.S. Supreme Court was forced to consider if civil forfeiture violated a person's right to due process, finally ruling that such seizures are not unconstitutional provided the property seized was an "instrumentality of crime."

But this creates a gray area of the law that has long been argued about by justices from the state level all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. It's possible that Sourovelis v. the City of Philadelphia will become another one of these arguable cases, though the hope is that a favorable resolution will be found somewhere down the road.

Sources: Forbes, "Time For Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws To Meet The Same Fate As Jim Crow," George Leef, Sept. 12, 2014, "Week in review: Lawsuit targets civil forfeiture laws in Pennsylvania," Andrew Staub, Aug. 29, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Why We Succeed


We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...


For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...


We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule a Case Evaluation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
West Chester Law Office Map

Review Us
Back to Top