The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
The Kelly Law Firm Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys

August 2016 Archives

sex crimes, aggravated indecent assault

In Pennsylvania, sex crimes are very serious charges.  Sex crimes such as aggravated indecent assault occur when a person forces a person to let him penetrate the anus or genitals of another person without their consent. In order for sex crimes such as aggravated indecent assault to occur, there are specific circumstances that must be met. These circumstances are that the offender uses force or threat of force; corruption of minors  there was no medical, hygiene or law enforcement reason for the penetration; the alleged victim was unconscious or unaware; the victim might have a mental disability that makes them unable to consent; the victim was younger than 13, or the victim was younger than 16 and the offender was 20 or older and not married to them.

Lifelong penalties are possible in drug cases

Facing drug charges is a challenging situation for anyone. When your job depends on your ability to remain without a criminal record, drug charges can be especially troubling. Just last week, we discussed the case of the police officer who has been charged with drug crimes after a sting operation. That is one example of a person who is facing not only criminal charges, but is also facing the end of a career because of them.

Criminal Defense, Disorderly Conduct

In Criminal Defense law in Pennsylvania, disorderly conduct charges are fairly common. Disorderly Conduct charges are common in Criminal Defense due to the fact that the disorderly conduct statute in PA covers a variety of different behaviors. It is a broad statute that allows law enforcement to gain control over situations that involve large crowds of people. According to the PA Crimes Code, "a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: engages is fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; makes unreasonable noise;  preliminary hearings uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture; or creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor". The purpose of the statute is not to punish any behavior deemed obnoxious or annoying, but rather to protect society from behavior that disrupts peace.

Suppression Motions: seizure

One of the primary issues in Suppression Motions is whether the police action against the defendant constitutes a seizure.  If a seizure occurs, then a court should grant a defendant's suppression motion and exclude evidence seized by the police.  The threshold issue for this Court to determine is whether the encounter rose to the level of a seizure. A seizure has legally occurred when an officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has restrained the liberty of an individual. Id at 623. "To decide whether a seizure has occurred, a court must consider all the circumstances surrounding the encounter to determine whether the police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that the person was not free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter. Stated differently, we ask whether a reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would have thought he was being restrained if he had been in the defendant's shoes." Important circumstances to consider include, but are not limited to, the following: the number of officers present during the interaction;  Miranda Rights whether the officer informs the citizen they are suspected of criminal activity; the officer's demeanor and tone of voice; the location and timing of the interaction; the visible presence of weapons on the officer; and the questions asked.

Vehicle searches and stops

A motor vehicle stop enacted without the proper level of suspicion violates the United States Constitution, and the Pennsylvania Constitution. Vehicle searches and stops in criminal cases may trigger violations of an accused's rights under the US constitution.  Vehicle searches and stops generally reuire that the police possess probable cause.  Generally, in order to effectuate a motor vehicle stop a police officer must have reasonable suspicion that a violation of Title 75 is or has occurred. 75 Pa.C.S. § 6308(b). Suppression motions  However, where an officer merely has reasonable suspicion that a violation of the motor vehicle code has occurred, and more cannot be gained by investigation during a seizure, then it cannot be a valid stop. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in a case named Chase explained that before a police officer may stop a single vehicle to determine whether or not the vehicle is being operated in compliance with the Motor Vehicle Code, he must have probable cause based on specific facts which indicate to him either the vehicle or the driver are in violation of the vehicle code.

DUI and the admissibilty of the PBT test

One issue that comes up in DUI cases concerns the admissibilty of PBT tests.  Generally speaking, in DUI cases the results of a PBT test are not admissible.  However, sometimes the PBT test might help the defense.  In those instances, is the PBT addmissible under Pennsylvania law?  Defending DUI casesThe portion of the Vehicle Code dealing with chemical testing to determine the alcoholic content of blood provides in pertinent part:

Consider the consequences of all charges, even minor ones

Shoplifting is viewed by some people as a minor crime. While it is true that shoplifting charges aren't nearly as serious as murder charges, you might still have to deal with very harsh consequences if you are convicted of the shoplifting charge. If you are facing this type of charge, you should carefully consider how your defense is going to be handled.

Appeals sufficiency of the evidence

If a case is lost then various appeals may be filed to higher courts to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.   Appeals challenging the sufficiency of the evidece challenge whether the government presented sufficient evidence to a jury or judge to win at trial.   In Pennsylvania, citizens are protected from being retried for the same crime due to the double jeopardy clause. There are special circumstances in which a retrial is permitted. Motions  One circumstance in which a retrial is permitted is when an appellate court reverses a defendant's conviction because of an error that occurred in the trial proceedings. There are two main components that could ultimately determine whether a defendant will have a retrial or not. They are known as the sufficiency of the evidence and the weight of the evidence.

Theft: Bribery

Bribery cases and other public corruptions cases such as theft can cause quite a commotion in the media and attract a lot of unwanted attention. Bribery is a type of theft crime and typically involves bribing public officials with large amounts of money or something of value in exchange for some sort of decision or action that will benefit the person making the bribe. There have been several different bribery cases that have gained major media attention over past years. One well-known case in Pennsylvania is known as "kids for cash". Identity Theft  This case involved President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan receiving large amounts of money from Robert Mericle, builder of private for-profit youth detention centers, in return for imposing harsh penalties on juveniles in order to fill more beds at his detention centers. Ciavarella and Conahan were ultimately found guilty on several charges.

Calling biological evidence into question is possible but hard

Indecent assault cases usually involve very personal elements. There are some instances in which more than just word of mouth comes into the picture in these cases. Some sexual assault cases involve DNA evidence, which can have a profound impact on the case.

Violent Crimes Simple Assault

In Pennsylvania, Violent Crimes such as simple assault are treated seriously. Violent Crimes statutes such as simple assault exist for the purpose of keeping you safe from being attacked. While some laws protect your property, simple assault statutes protect your well-being and keep you safe from unwanted attacks.  the Castle Doctrine You commit simple assault when you attempt or intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to another, when you negligently cause bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon, attempt by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury, or conceal or attempt to conceal a hypodermic needle on your person and intentionally or knowingly penetrate a law enforcement officer or an officer or an employee of a correctional institution, county jail or prison, detention facility or mental hospital during the course of an arrest or any search of a person. Simple assault is a second degree misdemeanor. If simple assault is committed in a fight or scuffle that was entered into by mutual consent, it is a misdemeanor of the third degree. If simple assault is committed against a child under 12 years old, committed by someone who is 18 years of age or older, it is then a first degree misdemeanor.

Why We Succeed

Preparation.

We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...

Experience.

For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...

Commitment.

We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule a Case Evaluation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
West Chester Law Office Map

Review Us
Back to Top