The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys Top 10 Attorneys American Jurist Institute 2017 American Jurist Institute Top 10 Attorneys Personal Injury Attorney | Top 10 Attorney And Practice Magazines | 2017
Law Offices of Kelly & Conte Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
Visa | Mastercard | American Express | Discover Network
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2016 top 100 lawyer ASLA
10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
American Jurist Institute Top 10 Attorneys
Top 10 Attorneys American Jurist Institute 2017

Update on DUI law in Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently issued a decision that significantly changes DUI enforcement.  In Commonwealth v. Barker (Pa. Super. July 10, 2013), the Superior Court reversed a DUI conviction on the grounds that the arresting officer refused to grant the defendant's request for a urine test rather than a blood test.  The specific language of the Superior Court in Barker was, "Thus, where the motorist requests alternative practicable testing and offers a facially valid reason for his request, we discern no basis in the statutory language for the officer to refuse the request."  This result completely changes the well-settled legal proposition that it is up to the arresting officer to determine what type of chemical test to use. 
 
In Barker, the defendant was arrested for DUI based on the arresting officer's observations that the defendant was under the influence of controlled substances.  The defendant was taken to a hospital for a blood test.  He refused to take the blood test, claiming that he was a "brittle diabetic" and that a previous needle shot received at the same hospital had resulted in an infection.  The defendant instead requested a urine test.  The officer refused to give the defendant the option of the alternative test.  The defendant was convicted at trial.  On appeal, the Superior Court reversed the conviction because the arresting officer refused to honor the defendant's request for a chemical test other than a blood test. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Why We Succeed

Preparation.

We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...

Experience.

For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...

Commitment.

We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule Your Free Consultation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

West Chester Office
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
Map & Directions

Pottstown Office
934 E High St #2
Pottstown, PA 19464

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
Map & Directions