The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014 | 4 years Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys Top 10 Attorneys American Jurist Institute 2017 American Jurist Institute Top 10 Attorneys Personal Injury Attorney | Top 10 Attorney And Practice Magazines | 2017 Criminal Defense Attorney | Top 10 Attorney And Practice Magazines | 2019 America's top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys | 2017 | top 100
Law Offices of Kelly & Conte Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
Visa | Mastercard | American Express | Discover Network
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | 4 years Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2016 top 100 lawyer ASLA
10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
American Jurist Institute Top 10 Attorneys
Top 10 Attorneys American Jurist Institute 2017

October 2017 Archives

Rule 600

A criminal defendant who is incarcerated in another jurisdiction is unavailable within the meaning of Rule 600 if the Commonwealth demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that it exercised due diligence in attempting to procure the defendant's return for trial, then the time period for which the defendant can't be found does not run against the government. school discipline hearings "Due-diligence is a fact-specific concept that is determined on a case-by-case basis." It is generally held that Rule 600 is tolled where the Commonwealth shows, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it has acted with due diligence in seeking extradition to bring the defendant to trial.... The matters of availability and due diligence must be judged by what was done by the authorities rather than by what was not done." Under Rule 600(c)(1), time between the filing of the complaint and a defendant's arrest may be excluded from calculation of the trial commencement period, provided the defendant could not be apprehended because his whereabouts were unknown and could not be determined by due diligence. In addition, the Comment to Rule 600 states a defendant is deemed unavailable during the time a responding jurisdiction delays or refuses to grant extradition.

DUI ignition interlock employment exemption

Ignition Interlock is not permissible as a result of DUI convictions. Sometimes an individual will be required, for employment purposes, to drive a vehicle for which it is not feasible to install an Ignition interlock device. Defending DUI § 1556(k) provides for an employment exemption that allows for the individual to drive employment vehicles "in the course and scope of employment without installation of an ignition interlock system." In order to do so, the employer must sign a PennDOT provided affidavit (DL-3805), which also must be notarized, stating that the employer is aware that the employee's license is restricted. The employee must carry this notarized form at all times while driving the employment vehicle. The employment exemption does NOT apply when the employee is able to use the employer vehicle for personal use. An individual using any vehicle for personal use must be driving a vehicle with the Interlock device. The employment exemption also does not apply when the employer vehicle is owned by the employee, or an entity that is wholly or partially-owned by the employee. (In other words, a small business owner cannot use the employment exemption to avoid the II requirement in his small business vehicle). Lastly, the employment exemption does not apply to school buses, school vehicles, or vehicles designed to transport more than 15 people. There are costs associated with ignition interlocks as a result of DUI convictions. According to PennDOT, the average cost of leasing an Ignition Interlock device to comply with the requirement is $900 to $1300 per year. The devices are installed by private vendors, which must be on the approved list at Some, if not all, of the vendors allow for payment plans to cover the costs. Costs include installation fees, removal fees, monthly lease fees, and calibration fees.

dui applying for ignition intelock a

To petition for applying for an Ignition Interlock for a DUI first the individual must have received an official notice of suspension or revocation from PennDOT. This notice must then be presented to an approved Ignition Interlock vendor. The approved vendors are listed at the Pennsylvania DUI Association website at The vendor will then install the Interlock in all vehicles to be operated by the individual looking to have the device installed. Under the new law, the device must be installed on all vehicles to be operated by the individual. This differs from the previous law surrounding Interlock devices, which required the device to be installed on all vehicles owned or registered to the individual. driving crimes If no vehicles are owned or will be operated by the individual, they must certify this to PennDOT using the appropriate forms. A vendor can charge a fee, at its discretion, for the service of certifying that no vehicles are owned by an individual. PennDOT will not issue an Interlock device until it receives the DL-1908SC form, which is a self-certification that the device has been installed on all vehicles to be operated by the individual. This form also must be signed by an authorized employee of the vendor who installed the device. The application fee is currently $65 and non-refundable.

DUI Igntion Interlock new rules

Act 33 of 2016 dealing with ignition interlock was passed on May 25, 2016 and went into effect 15 months later - August 25, 2017. Act 33 created a new section to set out the terms of the new Ignition Interlock law. It requires those with suspended licenses due to DUI or chemical testing refusals to install an Ignition Interlock device on all vehicles they will be operating. An individual with an Ignition Interlock still is considered to have a suspended license. DUI first offense Act 33 applies the Interlock requirement to even first-time offenders if they had a BAC of .10 or higher or are convicted of a controlled substance DUI. It does not apply to first-time offenders convicted under § 3802(a)(1) - general impairment, or §3802(a)(2) - BAC .08 to <.10. It also does not apply to those accepted into the ARD program - as of now, those individuals do not need to install the Interlock device and must serve the entirety of their (shortened) license suspension of 30, 60, or 90 days. (However, Act 30 of 2017 changed this, and effective October 20, 2018, individuals placed on ARD may, but are not required to, install the II in order to drive immediately).

DUI Ignition Interlock

Ignition Interlock laws in PA are undergoing huge changes. Pennsylvania Act 33 of 2016 amended Title 75 (Vehicle Code) to create a new "Ignition Interlock Limited License". In Pennsylvania, an Ignition Interlock device prevents a vehicle from being started unless the operator provides a breath sample indicating a BAC of less than .025%. These devices have been around for decades, but they are being increasingly used around the world to combat drunk driving. At this time, the devices used in Pennsylvania cannot detect drugs besides alcohol. DUI marijuana The new law creating the Ignition Interlock Limited License requires more individuals convicted of DUI (for both alcohol and drugs) to install the Ignition Interlock, but it also allows those drivers to get back on the road much sooner. Specifically, suspension times can be cut in half so long as the ignition interlock device is installed on a defendant's vehicle.

Treatment Court Drug Court

Treatment Courts are legal courts that focus primarily on treating the defendant for his or her addictions to alcohol or drugs. Treatment Courts such as Drug Court have been becoming more and more prevalent throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Treatment Courts provide a way for the accused to be supervised by the court and emphasize treatment and rehabilitation as opposed to punishment. ARD The primary reason that courts such as these became more prevalent is that typical ways of dealing with drug addicted crime simply was not working. Addicts typically do not get rehabilitated unless they hit bottom and are shown a path towards rehabilitation. Courts have found that simply locking up and addicts and throwing away the key does very little if anything to make sure that an addict does not reoffend. Instead, courts have found that the best way to deal with criminal defendants who are suffering from addiction is to try and provide assistance through the courts.

VIolent Crimes gun charges

One of the more serious types of violent crimes that a criminal defendant can be charged with in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is the crime of possession of a firearm with altered manufacturer's number. This Gun Crime and charge can be found in title 18 section 6110.2 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code. firearm charges The charge essentially makes it illegal for a criminal defendant to possess a firearm, even if he is otherwise legally permitted to possess one, if the firearm contains manufacturer's numbers that have been altered or changed in some manner. Although possession of such a gun wouldn't exactly be considered as a violent crime, it is a charge that is frequently charged along with other violent crimes. Additionally, although the statute does not specifically mention it, there is an intent requirement associated with this crime. The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused knew that the serial numbers on the gun had been altered or changed when he possessed the gun. Obviously, the government can try and prove this portion of their case through circumstantial evidence.

Sex Crimes SVP

One of the biggest issues associated with a conviction of sex crimes and and the associated SORNA requirements, is that a defendant can be found to be a sexual violent predator SVP. Child Endangerment Specifically, once a criminal defendant is convicted of a Megan's Law offense, the trial court must order for the defendant to be assessed by the Sexual Offender Assessment Board. The defendant is then ordered to meet with a representative of this Board, he can choose whether or not he wishes to participate in the interview, in order to determine whether or not he meets the criteria of a SVP. The way this works is after the defendant pleads or is found guilty, the court delays sentencing for 90 days so that the assessment can be completed. If the report from the Sexual Offender Assessment Board concludes that the defendant is not an SVP-then the defendant is immediately sentenced, however if the defendant is found to be an SVP then the defendant may hire his own expert and request a hearing in order to contest the finding.

Sex Crimes SORNA

Sex Crimes are extremely serious crimes to be charged with. Not only are the majority of sex crimes in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania felonies with maximum penalties of up to 20 years in state prison, but Sex Crime convictions also call for the implementation of SORNA. SORNA stands for Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act which can be found in Title 1 of the Adam Walsh Act. CYS investigations Many states in the United States have implemented some form of SORNA, but the type of registration requirements can vary drastically from state to state. SORNA (also known as Megan's Law) holds for requirements for individuals to become registered as sex offenders in Pennsylvania if they have been convicted of certain sex crimes. SORNA is a retroactive statute. What that means is the law requires some people that originally did not have to file as sex offenders at the time of their guilty plea or conviction to register as a sex offender under Megan's Law retroactively. Issues such as this are appealable to the higher courts in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Why We Succeed


We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...


For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...


We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule Your Free Consultation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


West Chester Office
126 W Miner St #1
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-344-7585
Map & Directions

Pottstown Office
934 E High St #2
Pottstown, PA 19464

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-344-7585
Map & Directions

Kennett Square Office
110 East State Street
Suite 305
Kennett Square, PA 19348

Phone: 610-422-7041
Fax: 610-344-7585
Map & Directions