The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
The Kelly Law Firm Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
2016 top 100 lawyer ASLA
10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys

Search of hotel rooms

This entry will deal with the question of whether a person can challenge a search made of his hotel room.

The United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions protect individuals from unreasonable searches of their person, homes, and effects.  Obviously, the question has arisen about whether that constitutional protection applies to a person in a hotel room.  The courts have answered this question not by looking at the type of property searched, but rather whether the person had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched.

In order to demonstrate a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched, the person must show two things: (1) the person had a subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched, meaning the person believed the area was private, and (2) that subjective expectation of privacy is one society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.  The most basic example of this concept is illustrated with someone's home: Adam and Ben are neighbors.  Adam has only gone to Ben's home for brief, social visits.  If the police search Ben's home and find drugs or other contraband and try to charge Adam for the drugs, Adam could not challenge the search done of Ben's home because Adam has no legitimate expectation of privacy in Ben's home.  The courts have routinely held that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in someone else's home just because they have been present in that home.

Dealing specifically with hotel rooms, Pennsylvania Courts have held that a person has a legitimate expectation of privacy in a hotel room during the period of time which the room is rented.  A person does not have a legitimate expectation of privacy during checkout or after the rental period has ended.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Why We Succeed

Preparation.

We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...

Experience.

For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...

Commitment.

We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule a Case Evaluation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
West Chester Law Office Map

Review Us
Back to Top