The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense 10 Best 2014-2016 | 3 Years | Client Satisfaction | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys WHO'S WHO | Top Professional | Certified 2017 top 100 lawyer ASLA 10 best 2016 client satisfaction| American Institute of personal injury Attorneys
The Kelly Law Firm Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
Call Anytime - Day or Night
610-314-7066 610-314-7066
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
AVVO Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Nation's Premier | NACDA | Top Ten Ranking 2014
10 Best 2014 | Client Satisfaction Award | American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys

Police Wiretaps How does the Government get one

In order for the police to obtain a wiretap, they must demonstrate several things to a Superior Court Judge in their affidavits and Court filings. Read more about Police Wiretaps here  Specifically, in order for the government to get a wiretap on a phone that they believe is being used in drug sales, the Government must show:

First, that the Government had probable cause to believe that particular communications concerning drug offenses may be obtained through interception of a cell phone allegedly possessed by a Target.

Second, that the Government had probable cause to believe that the cell phone from which oral communications are to be intercepted, is, has been, or is about to be used in connection with the commission of a drug offense.

Third, that the Government had probable cause to believe that the phone to be intercepted is owned or used by the Target

Fourth, the police must also show that they either unsuccessfully exhausted all other less intrusive means of investigation, or that those other means are too dangerous to try. (What this means is the police believe that normal investigative techniques, such as a controlled by of drugs from a target is too dangerous or won't work).

Challenging the Police Wiretaps

An accused can challenge a wiretap obtained by the police by arguing that the government did not make out the above requirements in their filings to the Superior Court. Specifically, an accused should argue that the government did not have probable cause to believe that the accused was involved in drug transactions, using his cell phone to make drug transactions, that the cell phone intercepted was his and that normal investigative techniques would not work. Additionally, an accused can also argue that the government intercepted a cell phone for a period longer than was necessary for them to discover the extent of the illegal drug transactions.  Learn more about the sale of narcotics here

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Why We Succeed

Preparation.

We prepare every case as if it is going to trial. Our reputation for thorough preparation puts us in a much stronger negotiating position with prosecutors and opposing counsel.

See what our clients are saying...

Experience.

For more than 15 years, people throughout Chester County and the surrounding area have turned to Law Offices of Kelly & Conte for sound legal advice and aggressive representation.

Learn more about our team...

Commitment.

We will not accept a deal simply for the sake of closing your case. We care about your future, and we pursue every available option in an effort to secure the best possible outcome.

View our case results...
Schedule a Case Evaluation

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Please note that First AND/OR Last Name, and Email AND/OR Phone are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Law Offices of Kelly & Conte
213 W Miner Street #3
West Chester, PA 19382

Phone: 610-314-7066
Fax: 610-436-0628
West Chester Law Office Map

Review Us
Back to Top